Tag Archives: Movie

Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning (pt 3)

:catch Part 1 here and Part 2 here:

Now, about the third film.  Yes, Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning is set in the 19th century.  Yes, that sounds very silly.  How in the hell have two girls dealing with werewolves in the modern era  suddenly found themselves stuck in the mid-1800’s fighting werewolves at a Canadian trade post?  The answer: there isn’t really one.  Toward the latter third of the film there are allusions to reincarnation and curses passed through families, but the film doesn’t force this idea and there aren’t any time travel shenanigans.  It just is.

So I’ll say this: if you had never seen the first two films and watched this one, it could stand on its own – which is respectable. Continue reading

Robin Hood

It has been a decade since Russell Crow and director Ridley Scott teamed up for the Spartacus remake, Gladiator and with Crowe’s star status cemented, the two have come together to again mix legend and history in Robin Hood.

In this origin story of the hood Robin, we see the English laying seige to a French castle in 1199.  This is the last stop on their way home after a Crusade that has left some, like Robin Longstride (Russel Crowe), feeling they did the Devil’s work, not God’s.  When King Richard the Lionheart is killed in battle, Longstride and Company take the news to England under the guise of Knights.  When Longstride goes to return a sword to the family of Loxley (whose namesake he has stolen), he assumes Loxley’s position as husband to Marion Loxley (Cate Blanchett) to keep the land from tax collectors (before Robert Loxley left for the Crusade, he failed to have children, and women aren’t allowed to own land at the time).  Cue combative, but gradual romantic interest.

Meanwhile, King John accepts the advice of Godfrey (Mark Strong) who is plotting to divide England in order to weaken the country before a French invasion.  During this time Godfrey is also trying to track down Longstride, who could reveal him as an agent for the French.

The last major foray into Nottingham Forest was helmed by American Kevin Kostner.  It was a fun adventure flick with few British accents and lots of pretty people.  With Ridley Scott, however, no one comes out clean – literally.  Scott’s attention to the messiness of Middle Age living (and Crusade conquering) makes you want to wipe your hands clean of the mud and blood.

This is why a Ridley Scott film differs from other action films of late: you get to experience realistic events without an overabundance of CGI (that you can see, anyway).  The battles are cringe worthy, prompting one to wonder, “How many stuntmen were killed to make this?”  So in this regard, Scott knows how to make a good old fashion action movie.

However, the plot is an over stuffed burrito exploding in the microwave.  Throw in how Robin Hood has something to do with the Magna Carta and you’ll be poking your neighbor asking for a guide-book.

SPOILER ALERT, SKIP PARAGRAPH

And again with the women needing saving (see Iron Man 2 review): Marion goes off to battle in her father’s armor, but when she confronts Godfrey (who killed her father), she has to be saved by Longstride.

Dear Hollywood: quit giving token empowerment to women.  If you’re going to make female characters badasses, then let them do the cool thing at the end before pulling the rug out from under them so the man can make the touchdown instead.

SPOILER ALERT OVER

Largely, the film’s plot is what hurts it the most.  It tries to go back and forth between the conflict on the Royal front and the life Longstride is building with bumbling difficulty.  Further, the only person I was excited to see in the film was William Hurt, who continues to pop up in random supporting roles (A History of Violence, Mr. Brooks) and God love him for it.  Blanchette and Crowe are okay, but Hurt and Mark Strong are the interesting ones (Hurt for his acting, Strong for his hawk head/mean look).

The film is one of those “eh” film experiences; it could have been worse, but it’s not great.  For me, the Disney version of Robin Hood remains great and even Kevin Costner’s version might still be better than Scott’s.

My rental suggestions aside, if you’re trying to select a film to see at the cinema I would direct you to the metal of arms of Tony Stark or even Neil Marshall’s Centurion before telling you to see Robin Hood.  Just because it stars Russell Crowe and is directed by a Brit don’t make it awesome.

PS

For the love of God do not take this film as history lesson.

Lady Gaga vs. M.I.A.

M.I.A. of “Paper Planes” fame isn’t a fan of Lady Gaga to say the least.  So after Gaga’s “Telephone” mini-movie/music video received so much attention, it seemed fortuitous (though I wouldn’t say planned given the time it takes to make even a short film) that M.I.A. had a mini-movie/music video of her own released a few months after Lady Gaga’s, titled “Born Free.”  For this piece, I’d like you watch the two back to back.

Here’s Lady Gaga’s “Telephone”

Continue reading

Erasing David

There are a variety of tools available to documentary filmmakers: Errol Morris used recreated events in The Thin Blue Line and Michael Moore is famous for “gotcha” style stunts.  The documentary Erasing David mines various documentary styles, but they can’t keep it afloat.

Directed and starring David Bond, the film follows David as he tries to evade private investigators (PIs) whom he has hired to track him down with his name as their only lead: the PIs have thirty days to find him.  David films himself during this period, verbalizing his concerns about being tracked when he uses his Blackberry or the internet.  We also follow the PIs as they obtain information on David through various methods: stealing garbage (twice), fraudulent phone calls, and obtaining a birth certificate (though it’s never explained how).

Erasing David takes place in the U.K. where, according to the film, millions of CCTV cameras make for the third-most surveillance-heavy state (coming in behind China and Russia). The idea of going off the grid is a pertinent one.  However, the film does not effectively deal with the deeper ramifications of electronic data.

SPOILER ALERT

There are multiple privacy experts that show up in the film, but they have little to say beyond “You’re at risk.”  We are never shown exactly how private information could be abused, other than showcasing two individuals who were wrongfully accused of crimes.

Further, in the film’s conclusion David reflects on the amount of information that’s available to the public about his life. The film then tries to link this commentary to David’s capture by the PIs after 18 days, implying that he was found via a vast web of information not kept private.

But that’s not what happened.

The only reason David is caught was because he gets sloppy and decides to visit his wife.  We’re not even sure how the PIs obtain the information that leads them to the couple’s meeting location (a hospital) other than one of the PIs pretended to be David over the phone.  That has nothing to do with electronic data or biometric scans–that’s just old-fashioned fraud.

Further, having a camera crew follow the PI’s as they try to find David undermines the paranoia and fear David exhibits as the days wear on.  When he talks to himself/the camera while out in the woods with the night vision on, we’re not afraid with him that the PIs are outside because we know where they are.  So because we know more than our main character, his fear and ramblings become comedic fodder, not dramatic gold.

These separate points of view also stymie any flow to the film, as we’re pushed and pulled from the present (“DAY TWO, HOURS ON THE RUN: 28”) to the past  (“FOUR WEEKS EARLIER”) so often that we don’t really care when and where we are – we just want to know why.

Some of the info we learn is interesting: an expert states that even though the U.K. has millions of cameras watching its citizens, these have no proven effect on crime.  Also, one of the best moments of the film is when David and his wife are talking about whether or not they’ll allow their child’s biometrics to be recorded.  David doesn’t want to do it because he’s worried his daughter could be persecuted based on data filed away somewhere (like the McCarthy trials, in which signatures from old Communist meetings were resurrected).  His wife, on the other hand, basically says if it becomes a problem, they’ll deal with it then.  Yeah, that worked really well for the ____________ (fill the blank with your minority of choice).

Though the documentary has an interesting subject, there are too many elements working against the film: several pieces feel staged (especially the segments with the PIs), the editing doesn’t keep the film focused, and the constant barrage of music fails to connect the audience to the film.

Though Michael Moore can be an asshole, he can keep you watching.  Erasing David, unfortunately, can’t bring home the sense of fear we should all have as we march into this brave new world.

*thanks to The Student for making this review possible.  You can read more film reviews at their website: http://www.studentnewspaper.org/film

The People vs. George Lucas: A Documentary

The current problem of George Lucas, summed up with one image.

Over at io9.com they’ve posted an interesting interview with the makers of The People vs. George Lucas, which talks to fans of Star Wars around the world and asks them how they feel about George Lucas.

The fans’ biggest gripe, of course, is Lucas’ failure to live up to the original Star Wars films with the subsequent green-screened prequels. They also object to his refusal to release Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back, and Return of the Jedi in their original, unaltered/non-CGI’d versions (even though Lucas argued against colorizing classic films before Congress).  The director of the film also mentions an interview in 1971 in which Lucas said,  “I like to think of myself as a toy maker who makes films,” which of course sounds like a precursor to the Ewoks in Return and the merchandising craze surround the franchise.

While I was chair of the University of Louisville’s Film Committee (we ran the campus cinema) I learned of  Lucas’ cutthroat business practices: refusing special screenings of any of the films to keep video sales up and forcing cinemas to hand over 90% of the first week’s grosses (compared with the industry standard of 70% to 80%. Every week a film is out, the cinema gradually receives more of the ticket sales, which is why opening weekend matter so much to studios and why your popcorn is so expensive).  It sounds like the filmmakers have delved into some of these issues and it will be interesting to see them reach a wider public.

Finally, discussing to whom films belong (especially when they’re culturally significant) is thought provoking, makes the interview a good read, and gives me optimism for the film.

Interview: http://io9.com/5500510/the-one-thing-george-lucas-could-do-to-sway-the-people-in-his-favor

A Kick-Ass Review

Now that we’ve hit the ceiling of superhero-film-awesomeness that was The Dark Knight, we can welcome a subsequent crop of self-conscious superhero flicks, starting with Kick-Ass.

Directed by Matthew Vaughn, Kick-Ass is the adaptation of Mark Millar’s comic book of the same name (Millar also wrote the Wanted comic).  The film follows high school nerd, Dave Lizewski, who reveals through heavy narrative exposition that he’s just a normal kid who always wanted to be a superhero. So after being mugged one too many times, he buys a green gimp suit, calls himself Kick-Ass, and begins fighting crime.

He quickly finds out it’s hard to kick any ass without fighting skills. Enter Big Daddy (Nicolas Cage) and his 11-year-old daughter, Hit-Girl, who are the real superheroes: Big Daddy’s the burly Batman wannabe, and Hit Girl is just someone you don’t want to fuck with, gymnastically taking out goons with knives, bullets, and sheer WTF-ness. Big Daddy and Hit-Girl’s war on crime boss Frank D’Amico makes Kick-Ass a target, bringing the disparate heroes together for some blood-letting.

Right off the bat, this is a fanboy movie, with Batman and Spider-Man references right and left.  Comic book film franchises have built an awareness of the most famous superheroes, and Kick-Ass plays into this audience awareness (keep your eyes peeled for “The Spirit 3”).  Further, the film includes a comic book sequence and a shootout from a first-person POV that videogame players will recognize.  This film is truly for the nerd in your life.

Hit-Girl

Even though the film wades in the waters of comedic self-awareness, the arrival of Hit-Girl as she brutally slaughters a room of drug dealers is a serious shock. Up until this point, Kick-Ass has been beating up guys in the middle of a crime (with little success), but no one has been killed.  Hit-Girl’s merciless slicing and dicing of those who aren’t even an immediate threat is unsettling (both for Kick-Ass and the audience).  This and a couple of other scenes make for some serious tone shifts during the film’s two-hour run.

Other than the aforementioned massacre, the rest of the battles are full of just as much humor as gore.  And as someone who is tired of children being off-limits in cinema (when was the last time you saw a child die on screen?), for me it’s nice to see the best, most vicious, badass superhero, be a small girl.  That’s female empowerment I can get behind.

Kick-Ass is definitely overshadowed by Hit-Girl and Big Daddy, who are the most entertaining aspect of the film, with Cage doing his best Adam West/William Shatner impersonation when masked.  The whole film should be focused on these two, not the silly teenager we’re supposed to identify with.

You’ll also have flashes of deja vu during the film’s musical interludes, as they’ve sampled “In the House-In a Heartbeat” (used in 28 Days Later‘s intense denouement), “Kanada’s Death, Pt. 2 (Adagio In D Minor)” (originally from Sunshine, although you might remember it from the Wolverine trailer), and the opening theme to For a Few Dollars More.

Tarantino said of using music in his films that he aims to use it better than the original film.  For some reason, the theme from For a Few Dollars More fit for a scene in Kick-Ass (for me anyway), but the samplings of 28 Days Later and Sunshine either didn’t fit the scene in which they were used, or just didn’t have the same power as their original placement.  Shame on you Matthew Vaughn; no more sampling for you.

But don’t let my film score hang-ups make you avoid this film.  This is not a bad movie.  Yes, in addition to the aforementioned grievances, you also have to deal with the usual melodrama clichés and romantic sub-plot drivel.  But overall the film is fun and it has balls, which I can’t say of a lot of mainstream films.

So go in knowing that it will be ridiculous and have a good time with it.

Director of Shaun of the Dead has new film

Director Edgar Wright (Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz) has a new film coming out this year called, Scott Pilgrim vs. The World.  Michael Cera (Arrested Development, Juno) stars as a guy who falls in love with a girl, but has to defeat  her 7 ex-partners via Mortal Kombat style confrontations:

The whole cast for the film is a hodge-podge of actors from the quirky ends of the film universe:

-Mae Whitman is in the trailer, the actress who played Ann Veal in Arrested Development (playing Michael Cera’s character’s girlfriend)

-Anna Kendrick, who is now famous for Up In the Air, but will always remain to me for her part in Rocket Science

-Jason Schwartzman (every Wes Anderson film)

With the sound effects and whatnot it immediately made me think of Super Smash Bros.  Hopefully this will be just as fun.

I Am Now an Award Winning Filmmaker

My latest short film, Dawn of the Living, just earned two awards at the Golden Video Awards here in Edinburgh:

Best Actor: Andy Edwards, Dawn of the Living

Best Film: Dawn of the Living

In case you missed it, here’s a trailer for the short, Dawn of the Living

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zUL-vywTAE

I’ve made three short films (4 if you include a small youtube video) and this is the first time I’ve won an award for my filmmaking, so it was quite an honor to receive this award.

Next filmmaking item is to finish editing my documentary for a class (it’s so nice to get a grade for making a film).  Despite the fact that this is my first foray into documentary filmmaking, it should be pretty good.

Predators Trailer Released!


First Look at New Predators

Predators poster

io9 is reporting from the South by Southwest Film Festival (SXSW) where producer Robert Rodriguez and director Nimrod Antal have shown footage of their film, Predators.  You can see the footage at this io9 piece or at the official website.

For the uninitiated, Predators is a direct sequel to the original 1987 Predator.  In the film Predators have brought the best warriors of Earth to duke it out on the Predator homeworld and stars Adrien Brody, Laurence Fishburne, Topher Grace, and a possible cameo from Schwarzenegger.

io9 has also reported that Brody gained 25 pounds of muscle and refused to sleep in a hotel, staying out in the Hawaiian jungle to get into the part.  This would make sense since Brody had eating issues after losing so much weight for The Pianist.

Director Antal also tried to assuage fears that Predators will not be like recent renditions of the franchise where building suspense and fear are sacrificed in favor of showing off the monsters.  “Trying to keep the monster in the shadows, more than throwing him in your face off the bat.”  The film is supposed to be practical effects heavy and Fox, who financed the film, told Rodriguez to protect the film from the studio’s own interference.

On the one hand, all of this sounds great and the behind the scenes footage jives with the talk, but could this be the filmmakers telling hardcore film fans what they want to hear (practical effects, low studio involvement, investment from cast)?

If it weren’t for Rodriguez’s filmography, I would be more skeptical.  He’s been able to bring us blood and awesomeness for the last two decades (although maybe not enough in the 2000’s), so I think they got the perfect guy to shepherd a new Predator film. With Rodriguez releasing Machete in April and Predators in July, we’ll have a lot to look forward to.