Tag Archives: Movie

Early Review: The Crazies

:author’s note:

This is a re-make of George A. Romero’s 1973 film, The Crazies.  I have not seen the original yet so my review of this re-make would not be colored with expectations prompted by the original.  However, I will provide a comparison in the near future.

Roger Corman is a man who has made careers’ worth of monster and horror movies on a shoe-string budget. At the Edinburgh International Film Festival last year, Corman highlighted the importance of theme and subtext in binding a project together and maintaining integrity. Newly-released horror flick The Crazies, however, is wading in the kiddie pool of film subtext.

The Crazies takes place in Ogden Marsh, Iowa, a town with less than 2,000 residents, whose portrayal cries out “Quaint Rural Living.” Farming is the main occupation, everyone plays baseball in the springtime, and the only minority you’ll likely encounter is the guy who buries you.  Yep, life sure is great in Iowa–until Sheriff Dutton (Timothy Olyphant) has to shoot an armed man during a baseball game…and another guy burns his family alive…what the hell is going on?

To go any further would spoil it for you, but I can say that if you liked Zack Snyder’s Dawn of the Dead (2004), a re-make of Romero’s original, you’ll love The Crazies: there are tons of blood, jumps, and action to entertain.

However, if you felt the Dawn re-make was a little flat compared to the original’s scathing critique of American consumerism, you’ll notice the same 2D feel in The Crazies. The movie is so busy rushing from one scare or battle to the next that it never gives itself the chance to develop the characters.  The continuous pattern of “BOO!”, kill bad guy, move on to the next bit, made it feel like I was watching someone play Resident Evil (not to mention a shot of the destroyed town that reminded me of Raccoon City’s devastation).

The pacing, of course, is intended to distract you from a lack of substance. While speaking to a friend about the film, I realized the big problem is we don’t see the characters change in response to SPOILER a military quarantine, the ensuing massacre, and a nuclear bomb wiping out their town. SPOILER OVER Despite these major upheavals in their daily life, they’re still the same people at the end as they were in the beginning.  Any time there was a quiet moment between Sheriff Dutton and his wife, I was awaiting another jump gag to pop into frame and preclude any meaningful dialog or growth.

The only point to all of this seems to be that the government and its military arm are bad; to make this statement, director Breck Eisner perpetuates myths of government control by displaying a military that has the manpower and the intel to quickly mobilize and completely quarantine a town within a 48 hour period.

Please.

We’re so busy tripping over our no-bid contracts, internal bureaucracy and corruption that we can’t effectively help refugees after a hurricane or fight a war.  The sudden apparation of the military is reminiscent of Shaun of the Dead’s final act: in Shaun it was meant to be funny, but The Crazies just wants you to swallow your disbelief.

Finally, the plot plays into the myth of the American Individual, proclaiming that no matter what (refer to spoiler section), you can overcome it all and survive.  Because you’re an American, goddamnit.

I was also bothered by a rather large plot hole MINOR SPOILER in which Sheriff Dutton stabs a “Crazy” infected woman in the throat, with a knife that is still lodged in his own hand, yet he does not become infected from the mixing of fluids. MINOR SPOILER OVER

Despite these issues, The Crazies is an okay horror film: kudos for practical effects and some directorial points.  But it just doesn’t have the heart that would make it good or even great.

If you’re looking for a horror film with more meat on the bone, check out Carriers (see my review here*).

*go in expecting a drama horror, not a bunch of gore and jumps; otherwise you’ll be disappointed

How Hollywood Stars Help Cinema

Considering making your own film and trying to make money?  Read this Slate article on independent cinema’s reliance on Hollywood stars before you max out your credit cards

http://www.slate.com/id/2126120/

Doom for Indie Flicks and Netflix?

Over at gawker.com they’ve had a recent spat of articles on the film industry written by Edward Jay Epstein.

In the first piece on independent cinema, he argues that Avatar’s huge success is one cause of the death of independent film financing.  Citing one example, a film was offered that could earn back 100% profit, but was turned down by big studios so they can seek even greater financial returns by blockbusters like 2012.

Epstein goes on to explain that the major source of funding for indie filmmakers was through pre-selling the distribution rights to foreign territories and using this as collateral to borrow from banks.  Due to the large amount of indie distributors in the U.S., these deals were passed assuming there would not be difficulty in finding a release Stateside to pad promotion in other parts of the world.

For the independent distributors in the U.S., the major funding came from deals with cable companies like HBO.  However, cable companies realized they didn’t need as many films to keep subscribers and less cash went to these distributors, like New Line Cinema, Fine Line Features, Picturehouse, Warner Independent, Fox Atomic, Paramount Vantage, and Miramax: all of which have gone under or have been bought out by the big guys since the cable company cutoff their cable deals.

If you have the time, read the whole thing

http://gawker.com/5465348/can-indie-movies-survive

And on the Netflix front, Epstein says they don’t have the type of collateral to compete in the long run with cable.  Currently they’re still doing most of their business with DVDs mailed to subscribers because of a legal loop-hole:

It gets its DVDS from wholesalers and even retail stores. It can then rent them because of a court-approved “first sale doctrine,” which says that once a person buys a DVD, he can re-sell it or rent it out.

However, this “first sale doctrine” does not apply to streaming films, where Netflix is trying move it’s business.  Thanks to a deal with Starz, Netflix has acquired the digital streaming license to many newer films from Disney, Sony and other studios.  However, both cable companies competing with Netflix’s (why subscribe to HBO when you can rent their content through Netflix?) and the film distributors are invested in closing Starz’s sub-lease agreement with Netflix.

Epstein says Netflix can’t compete with HBO, who is rolling out its own streaming services, but since Netflix’s main business comes from older titles, it won’t necessarily die out.

Again, if you have the time, read the whole thing

http://gawker.com/5471943/why-netflix-wont-be-the-hbo-of-the-21st-century

It’s interesting to consider the film ecosystem and one area’s shift causes such drastic consequences.  Especially in regard to the first piece: what’s going to happen to independent films now that drive-ins are dead, independent distributors are an endangered species, and less money is available at major studios for smaller films?

I imagine one of these major blockbuster films is going to flop and that’s when studios will watch their budgets.  Carolco Pictures (Terminator andTerminator 2) collapsed due to Cutthroat Island and all it would take is the failure of a 2012 or a Transformers to kill a company.  With smaller budget films like District 9 (it had a $30 million budget, but that’s small compared to the $200-400 million summer blockbusters) and Paranormal Activity, there are obviously companies thinking of their wallets.

Also, the independent distribution market will come back at some point (maybe with the aforementioned blockbuster flop).  Right now one business model has disappeared, but someone will find a new one.

Movie Poster Art

io9 recently published some articles about poster art in other countries.  Below are some posters from Thailand:

Day of the Dead

Evil Dead 2

GODZILLA!

And here are some from Ghana:

Evidently Evil Dead II has worldwide appeal. Chainsaws and boomsticks have that effect.

Why does this look romantic to me?

This is probably a horrible movie, but this poster makes it look awesome.

These posters from Ghana were put together during the 80’s when videocassette’s first came out.  entrepeneurs would go around with various videos, setting up screenings in rural areas.  These posters were used to advertise these screenings.

You can read the full Ghana io9 articles  here, and the one on Thailand film posters here.  The articles also have links to their sources, which feature more posters.

Official Release: Hank vs Ninjas, Nazis and a Chupacabra

The following is my short film, Hank vs Ninjas, Nazis and a Chupacabra.  This was put together from the Fall of 2008 to the Spring of 2009.  I waited to release it online to try to make some money from the DVD sales to cover various costs.  All profits were split equally among the 20+ cast and crew.

So now I offer this to you, online, free.  However, I have also included a Paypal “Donate” button.

This is what I ask: If you like what you saw, please donate $2.

If you really liked what you saw, you can by this on ebay for $3, which includes my first short, Neighborhood Watch.  Both films run about 20 minutes. Buy it here.

All donations will go towards the cost of my current slate of films:

Dawn of the Living (post-production): my first real foray into the dramatic aspects of horror

How Do We Die? (pre-production): five minute documentary on gravediggers and how they think of death

So here it is: Hank vs Ninjas, Nazis and a Chupacabra


US Donations UK Donations   

Thanks for all your support.

The Boys Are Back

About this time of year you have two types of films at the cinema: Oscar Bait and Left Overs.  The first is self-explanatory, the latter is a reference to film distributors releasing their “What the hell do we do with this?” selection between the drama filled fall/winter season and the heavyweight blockbusters of summer.

The Boys Are Back is the Oscar Bait.  Joe Warr (Clive Owen) has recently lost his wife, Katy (Laura Fraser), to cancer.  In the wake of her death, Joe must navigate his relationship with his six-year old son, Artie, and Harry, his son from a previous marriage.

Adapted from Simon Carr’s memoir The Boys Are Back In Town, this tale of a single father juggling home life and his career avoids gender clichés reminiscent of Mr. Mom.  Intriguing is Joe’s “just say yes” parenting style.  In Joe’s house, basic rules such as no swearing, no real fighting, etc. are in place, but Joe drives his 4×4 on the beach with Artie on the hood, sonorous with glee.  He even has water balloon fights – brace yourself – in the house!  If anything, the film’s representation of child rearing that encourages dangerous fun and large doses of freedom  makes it worth a viewing.

Further, as there have been few dramas, but plenty comedies, that focus on male single parents, the film is important for showing male homosocial relationships.*

The unfortunate part of the film is how many relationships are juggled.  Joe is dealing with grief, Artie, and then Harry.  One or even two of these alone could fill a film, but throw in that third ingredient and the film produces so-so results.  Knowing that the film is an adaptation of a book puts this in perspective, as it is definitely structured in a free-flowing way.  By the end you’re not really sure if Joe has really learned anything about his sons or even about himself.

The big pull for this film (if you didn’t figure it out by the film’s poster) is Clive Owen’s star power.  Even I’ll admit, as a fan of Sin City and Children of Men, Owen’s involvement is what pulled me to The Boys Are Back.  Many have stated that Owen’s performance is Oscar worthy and if I were the type of person who didn’t loath the Oscars, I’d like to say the same.  However, Owen does a good job, but is stymied by the film’s lack of focus.

Like so many films flaunting their accolades from the critics and festivals, this isn’t the best movie out now (I’d recommend The Road or Up In the Air), but it isn’t bad either.

*The only other films about male single parents that I can think of include Jersey Girl (2004), Evelyn (2002), and even The Road counts, but isn’t light like the others.

Other Recommendations:

Finding Neverland

Twitter and Filming in Dangerous Territory

Just as a FYI to those reading my blog regularly, I’ve finally succumbed to peer pressure and have a Twitter account.  This is purely for the blog, not for me personally.  So look up “RemingtonReview” or my full name, “Remington Smith,” and I’ll give you little blurbs on all film related items that don’t require lengthy treatises.

Also, I’ve just wrapped shooting on my latest short film, Dawn of the Living, and am starting on pre-production for another documentary short.  I’ll post photos and some tips on what to do and what not to do when trying to get a film made.  Due to the recent flurry of film activity, I will finally post on youtube (and this blog) my previous short, Hank vs Ninjas, Nazis, and a Chupacabra.

Finally, tomorrow I start a two-day conference on documentary filmmaking in dangerous areas.  I’ll be sure to keep you posted.  There’s even the chance to actually go out and do field work, but we’ll see what happens.

Peace,

Remington

Precious: Audience Responses?

No full, detailed review for this one, folks.  Instead, I’ll direct you to an in depth review herePrecious is fraught with even more political issues than Avatar.

My small review?  If you do not have experience with blacks, poverty, or urban living, you’ll talk about the  “realness” of the film and applaud its drama.  If you do have any experience with any of these aforementioned items, you might be offended.

Continue reading

The Book of Eli

Most New Year films are like the $5 DVD bins you find at Walmart: Old and crappy, but would cost more to store in a warehouse than it would to sell for the cost of a footlong sub. However, the release of films like The Book of Eli and Daybreakers, before the blockbuster juggernauts awake from their 8 month hibernation, is changing  regularly scheduled programming.  After reading my review of Daybreakers, you know it’s not the best vampire film ever, but it’s a lot of fun. The Book of Eli is playing at the same kid’s table.

Like so many post-apocalyptic flicks these days, The Book of Eli takes place on the road, as Eli (Denzel Washington) walks the blacktop of the southwestern U.S., foiling traps by Mad Max extras (sans vehicles) and revealing his zen and the art of kicking ass. Eli stops at a town to charge a battery, more goons hassle him, and they promptly receiving more kicking of the rear end.  When the Mayor, Carnegie (Gary Oldman), looks down at the bar and sees Eli in a pile of former thugs, Carnegie pulls out the charm to persuade Eli into staying as security detail.  Eli declines, saying he has business out West.  When Carnegie finds out Eli can not only read, but is carrying the book he’s been killing to locate, further kicking of the ass ensues.

Directed by Albert and Allen Hughes (whose last flick was From Hell 2001), this is an okay film that just misses average expectations.  Though Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman aren’t at their peak in this film, they’re good guys for the job:  Denzel has proven his ability to don “Strong Silent Type” roles since Man on Fire and Oldman has been rocking the bad guy roles since the 90’s with Dracula, The Fifth Element, and Leon: The Professional (highly recommend that one).  Hell, even Mila Kunis as Eli’s companion, Solara, doesn’t do a bad job.

The film’s weaknesses really rest in the directing and the writing.  Ever since Alfonso Cuaron blew us away with Children of Men in 2006, long takes have come into vogue, with McG copying the style in Terminator Salvation (2009) and The Hughes Bros. doing the same in The Book of Eli: A shootout occurs and the camera starts inside the house, goes out to Carnegie and his men firing, then moves back toward the house, through the bullet holes, and beside Solara and Eli.

There were a few scenes like this, which failed as they called attention to themselves.  In Children of Men you forgot that scenes played out in long takes because you were too involved with the story.  In The Book of Eli, however, these scenes (and other slow-motion moments) remind me of a George Carlin comment on playing jazz music: It’s not enough to know what notes need to be played, but why the notes need to be played.  They’re obviously pulling stylistic elements from Cuaron, but they don’t know why Cuaron did it that way, only that it looked cool.  Given the film’s push for dramatic realism, these hyper aesthetic moments undermine the directors’ goal.

And the writing.  What is it with endings these days?  Both The Road and Daybreakers had bad endings that could have been much cleaner given very simple changes.  The Book of Eli gets tossed in the same boat here, but the problems are a more complex: There isn’t merely a little trimming to be performed (The Road) or an extra quick scene or two to leave a realistic vibe (Daybreakers).  What The Book of Eli’s conclusion really needs is to amputate the didactic heavy-handedness that shows up like a drunk uncle at Christmas dinner and spoils the fun.

Finally, the makeup and special effects performed admirably.  My theory of CGI working better in the dark is demonstrated here, as backgrounds of devastated wasteland did not stand out nearly as much as a boat ride in the sunshine.

The little touches in the film were cool, like a hijacker wearing goggles with a bullet hole through one lens (implying the original owner is dead, possibly at the hands of the new owner, and that scavenging is a part of life) and a beat up poster for A Boy and His Dog in the background of Eli’s room while staying in town (Dog was a major influence for Mad Max, and hence, all post-apocalyptic films since).  Finally, the random appearance of Albus Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) as the POSSIBLE, MINOR SPOILER second half of a friendly, elderly cannibal couple was worth a few laughs for sheer randomness.  A whole film should be dedicated to those folks. POSSIBLE SPOILER OVER Keep your eyes peeled for a few other cameos.

In the end, the film is okay, starting strong, but wimping out as the final bell rings.  Daybreakers did a better job maintaining that world’s credibility while having some fun, and The Road is the closest we’ll get to gritty-realism in post-apocalyptic films for a while.  The Book of Eli plays in both courts, the fun and the serious, but doesn’t completely deliver the goods as well as its better cousins.

2 1/2 out of 5

PS

The Book of Eli actually plays out like a Western than the gritty survival  structures of post-apocalypse films: random stranger with badassness floats into town, attracts trouble, kills trouble, leaves town for vague mission.

Recommendations:

Mad Max, A Boy and His Dog, Carriers, The Road, Children of Men, High Noon, any Sergio Leone flick

The Road

One of the original The Road posters.

Ever since seeing the Coen Bros.’ film adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s novel No Country for Old Men, I’ve been dying to see his post-apocalyptic novel The Road receive the same treatment.  Because what’s more silver screen than a film about the end of the world and the ensuing hunger, cold, and cannibals? Continue reading